| « I have again disabled comments | Fossil Fuels 2: It's even more than I realized » |
This is a rather esoteric question, and most of you probably wouldn't think of it. (Who am I kidding when I say 'most of you'? Outside of the spammers who try to infest my blog with worthless material - at my expense - there are probably less than 20 people other than myself who read what I write here. Oh well, there's always the future and I may look back with surprise on some of the insights I have had in the past.)
Well, notwithstanding the peanut gallery in the back of my head, the question I want to make is a simple one, and I believe it has a reasonable answer. How many dimensions exist? How many dimensions do you need to encompass everything?
Right now, it's a certainty that there are no less than four. Height, width, length, and duration. It's when you go beyond the 4th dimension of time that you have problems. Our current problem is we lack the capacity to go in any other direction in the 4th dimension except forward. And that we currently lack the capacity to reach any dimension beyond the 4th. So for some people, they might not even believe there are any other dimensions beyond 4. But, as every dimension that we noted before had to have one beyond it in order for that one to exist, this implies that there should be at least 5 dimensions because we needed 4 dimensions to move through the first three, it might be arguable we need a 5th dimension in order to move through the 4th.
But then, beyond that, how many dimensions are there, or how many could there be? Is there a limit? For example, in temperature, there is no upper limit, things can get as hot as we can make them, up to and including the 2 million degrees heat which occurs during a nuclear explosion, as is pointed out in the book The Andromeda Strain. It may be possible to get even hotter than that in some cases. Usually it's not necessary, even the surface of the sun only needs to run at about 10K Fahrenheit to operate and I think only 6K inside. Or it might be the other way around.
But the lowest possible temperature you can get to is, if I'm not mistaken, 0 Kelvin, something like -271 degrees, what we call "absolute zero". (I just looked it up, and I was close. It's -273.15, but that's celsius. It's ?459.67 ?F). You can't get any colder than that because all molecules stop moving and if there's no further motion, there's no colder you can go. Remember, heat is determined by molecular motion; the faster the molecules move, the hotter it is. If they completely stop, they can't get any colder, e.g. there is no such thing as "600 degrees below zero." Or at least, that's the theory right now; 10,000 years from now that may change.
So, going back to my original question, how many dimensions are there? Some people give a large number. Some say it's infinite. (Sometimes I think claiming anything is 'infinite' is a fancy way of saying 'it's too big for me to count,' sort of like those people in certain primitive societies whose number system consists of 'one, two, many.') I think a few people have pinned it down to a number like twenty, or eleven. Some have asked the question, is the number arbitrary, if it is eleven, couldn't it be nine, or twelve, or 42? (I threw in 42 because I like the symmetry and the connection to Douglas Adams book 'Life, the Universe, and Everything' where the most important answer in the universe is, of course, 42. The question is the one that's hard.)
I've been doing some reading and I listened to it before, and the guy who has the website for his book at tenthdimension.com which he argues, and rather successfully from my point of view, that basically ten dimensions covers everything. So here's where I try to argue that there are, in fact, ten dimensions.
Summarizing his ideas, and adding a few comments of my own, here's how we get ten dimmensions:
I like the simplicity of this because it seems to make sense. Of course, it could be completely wrong. That hasn't stopped people from believing in a lot of things that are totally wrong, but at least I have a reason for doing so, because the logical premises underlying this concept, at least for now, do seem to be correct.
The only reason I wrote this article is that I wanted to remember the reasons why there are ten dimensions. I kept forgetting where the website that had the video was, and I couldn't remember the arguments for why there were a total of ten dimensions to cover everything.